MEMBER ITEMS FOR SALE
Custom Knives | Other Knives | General Items
-------------------------------------------
New Posts | New PhotosAll Photos



Go Back   The Knife Network Forums : Knife Making Discussions > Custom Knife Discussion Boards > Knife Making Discussions > The Newbies Arena

The Newbies Arena Are you new to knife making? Here is all the help you will need.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2010, 12:35 PM
reefera4m reefera4m is offline
Steel Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 102
Thoughts/opinions on Blade finish prior to heat treating

I'm interested to know how fine a finish whould be best on blades prior to heat treating, i.e. hardening/quenching and tempering. My approach to date has been to polish the blade to 220/320 grit. My rational is that 1) it is easier to work the softer steel and 2) removing any deeper scratches/grind marks reduces the possibily of cracks or fractures along them.

I haven't seen any negative consequences from this finish but wonder if there could be.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2010, 01:54 PM
Alan L's Avatar
Alan L Alan L is offline
Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
Posts: 988
Depending on the blade I'll take it to either 220 or 400. If I go to a finer polish than 220 I use antiscale compound during the HT to prevent decarb.

I use the same rationale as you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2010, 02:14 PM
NJStricker's Avatar
NJStricker NJStricker is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,193
I generally go to 320 or 400 grit for my blades, which are high carbon (1080) quenched in peanut oil. You definitely want to get the deeper scratches out before HT, much harder to get them out afterward.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2010, 02:24 PM
Ray Rogers's Avatar
Ray Rogers Ray Rogers is offline
Founding Member / Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wauconda, WA
Posts: 9,840
I agree with all of the above. That said, I tend to do all my grinding after the HT. That way, I avoid possible issues of stress risers, most warpage, decarb, etc. With practice and the right belts you can avoid the issues with the deep scratches but, even so, I would imagine that some of my finished blades may not be as perfect as some of yours although they are probably better than you might think .......


__________________

Your question may already have been answered - try the Search button first!






Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2010, 02:30 PM
DaveRuhlig's Avatar
DaveRuhlig DaveRuhlig is offline
Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 840
I usually go to 220 - mainly because I start with 220 after HT to clean up the scale. It would make much sence for me to go to 400+ prior to HT if I'm just going to scratch it up w/220 after.

I should point out this is for my high carbon blades (10XX) - If I were doing stainless in an oven without scale it would be a different story.

-Dave


__________________
www.ruhligknives.com

"The choice isn't between success and failure; it's between choosing risk and striving for greatness, or risking nothing and being certain of mediocrity." - Keith Ferrazi
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2010, 02:57 PM
DaveL DaveL is offline
Skilled
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 449
I found that grinding after heat treat is a great way to go but when i do otherwise I go to 400.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2010, 05:32 PM
NJStricker's Avatar
NJStricker NJStricker is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveRuhlig View Post
I usually go to 220 - mainly because I start with 220 after HT to clean up the scale. It would make much sence for me to go to 400+ prior to HT if I'm just going to scratch it up w/220 after.

I should point out this is for my high carbon blades (10XX) - If I were doing stainless in an oven without scale it would be a different story.

-Dave
The one advantage I've seen with finishing to a higher grit is that you don't have quench scale sitting in the deeper scratches. Even with a vinegar soak, they are sometimes tough to get out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2010, 05:39 PM
dbalfa's Avatar
dbalfa dbalfa is offline
Skilled
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 363
I usually go down to 400 for tool steel or stainless. I will use a HT powder on the tool steels to avoid the decarb. However, 220 is not all that hard to clean up post HT with the right, sharp belts....


__________________
Dennis

"..good judgement comes from experience, experience comes from poor judgement.." -Gary McMahan, a cowboy poet and good dancer.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/p...24112090995576
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2010, 08:06 PM
ranger1's Avatar
ranger1 ranger1 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lexington,NC
Posts: 2,414
400 grit for me.


__________________
Andy Sharpe
I ruin perfectly good steel!!
www.sharpeknives.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2010, 09:52 PM
Arccher Moon Arccher Moon is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Marsing Idaho
Posts: 75
What would be the best way with 5160? Looking for a working blade finish. Maybe down to a 400 grit for a final.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-20-2010, 12:35 AM
reefera4m reefera4m is offline
Steel Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 102
5160 finish

Arccher Moon,

400 grit is what I plan to finish my next knife of 5160 steel. I finished my last one with 800/1000 and while it gave an almost mirror finish it was more work than it needed to be and will probably require more maintenance. On the way to 800 grit I liked the look of the 400 grit finish the best.

The only plus that I have seen with the finer grits is that is it cleans up easier. That sounds like a contradiction with regards to my expectation of greater maintenance but its not. The maintenance require is associated with scratches - 800/1000 grit finishes show small scratches and they tend to stand out. On the other hand, high polished finishes don't trap water and/or other contaminants as much as coarser surfaces making them easier to clean and dry. Rust that forms seems to be much lighter and easier to remove and prevent. When I was wet sanding at 400 grit, rust formed almost immediately. When I moved to finer grits rust formation was less evident.

I suppose that an argument coud be made that a highly polished blade would be better for cutting and chopping due to its lower friction, but IMHO that would be a stretch.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-20-2010, 09:15 AM
Ray Rogers's Avatar
Ray Rogers Ray Rogers is offline
Founding Member / Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wauconda, WA
Posts: 9,840
Actually, you would probably find that a high polished blade can be a real problem if you're cutting something wet like meat or tomatoes. The wet material can really adhere to those polished surfaces ....


__________________

Your question may already have been answered - try the Search button first!






Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blade, knife


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heat Treating a Blade mustang_man Heat Treating and Metallurgy 1 01-05-2006 07:05 PM
Heat Treating D2: Pre HT finish? TikTock Heat Treating and Metallurgy 1 06-14-2005 02:17 PM
Heat Treating My First Blade. Questions. Tbonz Heat Treating and Metallurgy 7 11-29-2004 03:51 AM
ATS-34 thickness prior to heat treat? William The Newbies Arena 3 06-06-2002 07:48 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.




KNIFENETWORK.COM
Copyright © 2000
? CKK Industries, Inc. ? All Rights Reserved
Powered by ...

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The Knife Network : All Rights Reserved